8. Türkiye Lisansüstü Çalışmalar Kongresi - Iv

Yazarlar:
Asya Karagül
Yayın Yılı:
2019
Yayıncı:
İnönü Üniversitesi
Dil:
Turkish
ISBN:
978-605-7824-08-0 (Tk) 978-605-7824-12-7
Özet:
Giriş Kara gücü olma özelliğini altı asırlık tarihi boyunca muhafaza etmiş Osmanlı Devleti, ya da bir başka deyişle Memâlik-i Mahrûsa-i Şahâne, bu alanda uzun yıllar başarısını korumuştur. Ancak 18. yüzyıla gelindiğinde kıtalar boyunca yayılan hâkimiyet sahası bazı kırılmalar yal -Öz: Kara gücü olma özelliğini altı asırlık tarihi boyunca muhafaza etmiş Osmanlı Devleti, 18. yüzyıla gelindiğinde kıtalar boyunca yayılan hakimiyet sahasında kırılmalar yaşamaya başlamış, kısa zamanda elde edilen büyük zaferler yerini uzun soluklu ve eziyetli kuşatmalara bırakmıştır. Kültürel yahut idari mekanizmalardaki bozulmalardan ziyade halkı ve devleti en çok etkileyen nokta kaybedilen savaşlar olduğundan reform programları öncelikli olarak askeriyeden başlamıştır. 15. ve 17. yüzyıllar arasında "model alınan" ordu konumundaki Osmanlı ordusu, 18. yüzyıl itibariyle Avrupa dahilindeki paradigma ordusunu model alan bir savunma gücüne dönüşmüştü. Alman İmparatoru elçisi Busbecq'in vaktiyle yürüyen küçük bir ormana benzettiği Osmanlı piyadesi etkisini kaybetmeye başlamış ve ordunun teknik ve doktrin anlamındaki eksikliği gün yüzüne çıkmaya başlamıştı. Devletlerarası taklide en açık kurum olan askeriyeler, dünya eksenindeki paradigma ordu üzerinden subay değiş tokuşu, danışman heyetleri gibi etkileşimler sağlayarak bu orduların taktiklerinden kurumsallıklarına, talimlerinden üniformalarına kadar kopyalamaya çalışırlar. İlk topyekûn reform programı olarak kabul edebileceğimiz III. Selim ve Nizam-ı Cedit devrinde dünya nezdindeki paradigma ordu Fransız ordusudur. Nizam-ı Cedid devri askeri reformlarında Fransız ordusunu kendine temel olarak kabul eden ve taktik, talim, doktrin anlamında bu ordunun nüvelerini kendine adapte etmeye çalışan Osmanlı Devleti, Avrupalı danışmanlara başvuracaktır. Bu çalışmada Nizam-ı Cedid ordusundaki Fransız danışmanlar çerçevesinde gelişen Fransız ekolü ele alınarak dönemin ordusu ve askeri unsurları üzerindeki aktif etkisine değinilecektir. Çalışmada temel olarak Başbakanlık Osmanlı Arşivi kaynakları kullanılmakla birlikte konu hakkındaki mevcut literatürden faydalanılmıştır. şamaya başlamış, kısa zamanda elde edilen büyük zaferler yerini uzun soluklu ve eziyetli kuşatmalara bırakmış, devletin kuruluşundan bu yana en temel özelliği olan merkeziyetçi bakış açısı tahtını farklı güç unsurlarıyla paylaşmak zorunda kaldığından coğrafya üzerindeki hâkimiyet dağılmıştır. Uzun kuşatmaların getirdiği memnuniyetsizliğe ekonomik bunalımlarda eklenince toplumun ve devletin içine düştüğü sıkıntılı ortam devlet adamlarını çözüm arayışına itmiştir. Devlet aklının eski gücünü kaybettiğinin farkına varması ve kabullenmesi belli bir vakit aldığından başlangıçta bu çözüm yöntemi "Kanun-ı kadim"e dönmek olarak tespit edilmiştir. Zira savaşlardan zaferle çıkan, krallara taç giydiren hükümranlık özelliklerinin kanun-ı kadimde yattığı ve Osmanlı Devleti'nin zamanla bu esas çizgiden, yükselişe sebep olan denklemden uzaklaştığı düşünülmekteydi. Bazı girişimler ile gücün geri kazanılması hedeflendiyse de aradan geçen zaman Osmanlı devlet adamlarına bir şey öğretmişti, devletin sadece bir kurumu değil tümünde bir çatlama mevcuttu ve eski küresel güç yitirilmişti. Osmanlı Devleti artık atını istediği coğrafyaya süremiyor, stratejik ortak arayışlarına giriyor ve denge politikasını gözeterek savunma pozisyonunu korumak zorunda kalıyordu. Devletin idari yahut kültürel mekanizmalarından ziyade devlet adamlarını daha çok sıkıntıya sokan durum kaybedilen savaşlardı. Osmanlı ordusundaki teknik ve doktrin hususundaki aksaklıklar oldukça aşikâr olduğundan ilk reform çalışmalarına askeriyeden başladı. Zira "eldeki orduyla kıyamete dek harp edilse düşmana karşı zafer elde etmek mümkün değildir. " (Yıldız G. , 2013, s. 37) düşüncesi yaygın bir algıydı. Alman İmparatorluğu elçisi Busbecq'in vaktiyle yürüyen küçük bir ormana benzettiği Osmanlı piyadesi, akıncı süvarisi, ağır muhasara topları etkisini kaybetmeye başlamıştı (Berkes, 2017, s. 75). Osmanlı ordusunun çağdaşlarının aksine talim ve terbiyeden yoksun olmasının yanı sıra dünyadaki ordu algısı değişikliğe uğramış ve "büyük düzenli ordu" konsepti neredeyse her devlet tarafından benimsenen bir doktrin halini almıştı. 15. ve 17. yüzyıllar arasında "model alınan" bir taarruz ordusu olan Osmanlı ordusu, 18. yüzyıl itibariyle Avrupa'da dönemin güçlü ordusu hangisiyse onu "model alan" bir savunma gücüne dönüşmüştü (Yıldız G. , 2013, s. 41). Artık Osmanlı taktik ve stratejilerinde değişime gidilmesi gerekmekteydi. John Lynn'in açıkladığı gibi askeriyeler diğer kurumlarla kıyaslandığında birbirlerini takilide en açık oluşumlardır. Bu taklit ilk olarak muharebe meydanında başlar. Birbirleriyle sık savaşan ordularda pek çok benzerlik görülmektedir. Bu benzeşme süreci, ordulardan birinin diğerlerine üstünlük sağlamasıyla başka bir aşamaya evrilir. Bu aşamada artık paradigma ordusu haline gelmiş olan mutlak-galip ordu, diğerleri tarafından her açıdan taklide maruz kalır. Subay değiş-tokuşuyla ve zamanla diplomatik ilişkiler bağlamına yerleşen danışman heyetleriyle bu ordular, taktiklerinden kuruluşlarına, talimlerinden üniformalarına kadar kopyalanmaya çalışılır. Bu sürecin mutlak olumsuz yönü ise görünüşte paradigma

8th Graduate Study Congress In Turkey - Iv

Yazarlar:
Asya Karagül
Yayın Yılı:
2019
Yayıncı:
İnönü Üniversitesi
Dil:
Turkish
ISBN:
978-605-7824-08-0 (Tk) 978-605-7824-12-7
Özet:
(AI):
The Ottoman state, which has preserved its characteristic of being the entrance black power over the six centuries of history, or in other words, the mematya-i mahrusa-i şahane, has preserved its success in this field for many years.But in the 18th century, the domination field spread throughout the continents was some breaks: the Ottoman state, which retained its characteristic of being a land power over the sixth century history, in the 18th century, the domination field spread throughout the continents began to experience breaks, and the great victories achieved in the short time left its place to long-deathed and suffering circumstances.Instead of disturbances in cultural or administrative mechanisms, the people and the state are the most influential points of losing wars, and the reform programmes began primarily with the military.The Ottoman army in the position of the "modeled" army between the 15th and 17th centuries had since the 18th century become a defense force that modeled the paradigm army within Europe.The Ottoman peasant influence, which the German ambassador Busbecq looked like a small forest walking with time, began to lose, and the lack of the military in the technical and doctrinal sense began to appear.The armies, the most open institutions in inter-state imitation, attempt to copy from the tactics of these armies to their institutionality, from their instructions to their uniforms, by providing interactions such as the paradigm army in the world’s axis, the exchange of officers, the advisory delegations.I. I. I. I. I. I. I. I. I. I. I. I. IThe paradigm army in the world in the Selim and Nizam-i cedit era is the French army.The Ottoman state, which recognizes the French army as the basis of its military reforms and tries to adapt the nucleus of this army in the sense of tactics, instructions, doctrines, will apply to European consultants.In this study, the French counsel in the Nizam-i-Cedid army will address the active influence on the army and military elements of the time, developing in the framework of French counselors.The study was mainly used by the Prime Minister's Ottoman archive resources while taking advantage of the current literature on the subject.The great victories that began to shame, the great victories that were achieved in the short time, left their place to long and suffering circumstances, the centralist perspective, which has been the most fundamental feature since the state's establishment, has been forced to share the throne with different power elements, and the sovereignty over the geography has been dispersed.When the dissatisfaction brought by long circumstances was added to economic disasters, the troubled environment in which the society and the state fell pushed the people of the state to seek a solution.Since it takes a certain time to realize and accept that the state mind has lost its old power, this method of solution was initially identified as a return to the "law-i old".For it was believed that the rule characteristics that came out of wars with victory, which worn the kings in the law in the age of age, and that the Ottoman state was removed from this basic line, from the equation that led to ascension over time.Although some attempts were aimed at regaining power, the past time had taught something to the Ottoman state men, there was a breakdown in the whole of the state, not just one institution, and the old global power was lost.The Ottoman state is no longer able to go to the geography it wants, it is entering the search for strategic partners and was forced to maintain its defence position by monitoring its policy of balance.The situation that puts the government in trouble more than the administrative or cultural mechanisms of the state was the lost wars.The technical and doctrinal disadvantages in the Ottoman army were quite obvious, and the first reform work began with the army.“If the army in the city is harmed until the Day of Resurrection, it is impossible to win against the enemy." (Star g., 2013, p. 37) the thought was a common perception.The Ottoman pedestrian, where the ambassador of the German empire, Busbecq, looked like a small forest walking with the time, began to lose the influence of the flowing cavalry, the heavy accounting balls (Berkes, 2017, p.In contrast to the contemporaries of the Ottoman army, the lack of instruction and training, the army perception in the world has changed and the concept of "big regular army" has become a doctrine adopted by almost every state.The Ottoman army, which was a "modelled" army between the 15th and 17th centuries, had since the 18th century become a "modelled" defense force, regardless of the powerful army of the time in Europe (Star G., 2013, p.We had to change our tactics and strategies.As John Lynn explains, the armies are the most open formations in tracking each other when compared to other institutions.This simulation begins first on the battlefield.There are many similarities in the armies that often fight with each other.This process of similarity evolves into another phase by giving one of the armies superiority to the other.The absolute Gallipus army, which has now become a paradigm army at this stage, is exposed to imitation from all respects by others.Change of officer andThe Ottoman state, which has preserved its characteristic of being the entrance black power over the six centuries of history, or in other words, the mematya-i mahrusa-i şahane, has preserved its success in this field for many years.But in the 18th century, the domination field spread throughout the continents was some breaks: the Ottoman state, which retained its characteristic of being a land power over the sixth century history, in the 18th century, the domination field spread throughout the continents began to experience breaks, and the great victories achieved in the short time left its place to long-deathed and suffering circumstances.Instead of disturbances in cultural or administrative mechanisms, the people and the state are the most influential points of losing wars, and the reform programmes began primarily with the military.The Ottoman army in the position of the "modeled" army between the 15th and 17th centuries had since the 18th century become a defense force that modeled the paradigm army within Europe.The Ottoman peasant influence, which the German ambassador Busbecq looked like a small forest walking with time, began to lose, and the lack of the military in the technical and doctrinal sense began to appear.The armies, the most open institutions in inter-state imitation, attempt to copy from the tactics of these armies to their institutionality, from their instructions to their uniforms, by providing interactions such as the paradigm army in the world’s axis, the exchange of officers, the advisory delegations.I. I. I. I. I. I. I. I. I. I. I. I. IThe paradigm army in the world in the Selim and Nizam-i cedit era is the French army.The Ottoman state, which recognizes the French army as the basis of its military reforms and tries to adapt the nucleus of this army in the sense of tactics, instructions, doctrines, will apply to European consultants.In this study, the French counsel in the Nizam-i-Cedid army will address the active influence on the army and military elements of the time, developing in the framework of French counselors.The study was mainly used by the Prime Minister's Ottoman archive resources while taking advantage of the current literature on the subject.The great victories that began to shame, the great victories that were achieved in the short time, left their place to long and suffering circumstances, the centralist perspective, which has been the most fundamental feature since the state's establishment, has been forced to share the throne with different power elements, and the sovereignty over the geography has been dispersed.When the dissatisfaction brought by long circumstances was added to economic disasters, the troubled environment in which the society and the state fell pushed the people of the state to seek a solution.Since it takes a certain time to realize and accept that the state mind has lost its old power, this method of solution was initially identified as a return to the "law-i old".For it was believed that the rule characteristics that came out of wars with victory, which worn the kings in the law in the age of age, and that the Ottoman state was removed from this basic line, from the equation that led to ascension over time.Although some attempts were aimed at regaining power, the past time had taught something to the Ottoman state men, there was a breakdown in the whole of the state, not just one institution, and the old global power was lost.The Ottoman state is no longer able to go to the geography it wants, it is entering the search for strategic partners and was forced to maintain its defence position by monitoring its policy of balance.The situation that puts the government in trouble more than the administrative or cultural mechanisms of the state was the lost wars.The technical and doctrinal disadvantages in the Ottoman army were quite obvious, and the first reform work began with the army.“If the army in the city is harmed until the Day of Resurrection, it is impossible to win against the enemy." (Star g., 2013, p. 37) the thought was a common perception.The Ottoman pedestrian, where the ambassador of the German empire, Busbecq, looked like a small forest walking with the time, began to lose the influence of the flowing cavalry, the heavy accounting balls (Berkes, 2017, p.In contrast to the contemporaries of the Ottoman army, the lack of instruction and training, the army perception in the world has changed and the concept of "big regular army" has become a doctrine adopted by almost every state.The Ottoman army, which was a "modelled" army between the 15th and 17th centuries, had since the 18th century become a "modelled" defense force, regardless of the powerful army of the time in Europe (Star G., 2013, p.We had to change our tactics and strategies.As John Lynn explains, the armies are the most open formations in tracking each other when compared to other institutions.This simulation begins first on the battlefield.There are many similarities in the armies that often fight with each other.This process of similarity evolves into another phase by giving one of the armies superiority to the other.The absolute Gallipus army, which has now become a paradigm army at this stage, is exposed to imitation from all respects by others.Change of officer and